The size of Selmer groups for the congruent number problem. II. With an appendix by P. Monsky. (Q1340642): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The parity of the rank of the Mordell-Weil group / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Notes on elliptic curves. II. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5772619 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The size of Selmer groups for the congruent number problem / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 09:56, 23 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The size of Selmer groups for the congruent number problem. II. With an appendix by P. Monsky.
scientific article

    Statements

    The size of Selmer groups for the congruent number problem. II. With an appendix by P. Monsky. (English)
    0 references
    25 January 1995
    0 references
    In a previous paper [*] [the author, Invent. Math. 111, No. 1, 171--195 (1993; Zbl 0808.11041)] the author studied the distribution of the algebraic rank \(r(D)\) of the elliptic curve \(E_ D\): \(y^ 2 = x^ 3 - D^ 2x\). The positivity of \(r(D)\) is equivalent to \(D\) being a congruent number. As in [*] the author uses the method of descents being particularly interested in the ``full 2-descent''. The number of 2- descents is the order of the Selmer group \(S^{(2)}\) which is equal to \(2^{2 + s(D)}\), where \(s(D)\) is called the Selmer rank of \(E_ D\) and \(r(D) \leq s(D)\). The author completes his previous result concerning the distribution of \(s(D)\). More precisely he proves that given \(h = 1,3,5\) or 7 and \(k \geq 1\) a fixed integer then \[ \sum_{D \in S(X,h)} 2^{ks(D)} = c_ k\;\# S(X,h) + o_ k (X), \quad \text{as } X \to \infty, \] where \(c_ k = \prod^ k_{j=1} (1+2^ j)\), \(h\) is an odd integer and \(S(X,H) = \{D \equiv h \pmod 8\); \(1 \leq D \leq X,D\) square free\}. From this result he obtains that if \(h = 1\) or 3 and \(r\) is even, or if \(h = 5\) or 7 and \(r\) is odd, then \[ \# \{D \in S(X,h);\;s(D) = r\} \sim d_ r\;\# S(X,h), \quad \text{as} \quad X \to \infty, \] where \(d_ r = (\lambda 2^ r)/(\prod_{1 \leq j \leq r} (2^ j-1))\), for \(r \geq 0\), and \(\lambda = \prod_{n \geq 1} (1 + 2^{-n})^{-1}\). Furthermore, the former result also implies, as in [*], the following average estimates for \(s(D)\): \[ \sum_{D \in S(X,h)} s(D) = c'\;\# S(X,h) + o(X), \quad \text{as} \quad X \to \infty, \] where \(c' = \sum_{k \geq 0} {1 \over 2^ k+1} \pm {1 \over 2} \prod_{k \geq 1} ({1-2^{-k} \over 1 + 2^{-k}})\), the positive sign appears in the case where \(h=5\) or 7 and the negative one in the case where \(h = 1\) or 3. Similar inequalities are obtained replacing \(s(D)\) by \(r(D)\) taking into account that \(r(D) \leq s(D)\). One interesting remark in the paper concerns the parity condition which was unproved in [*], i.e., that \(s(D)\) is even if \(D \equiv 1\) or \(3 \pmod 8\), and \(s(D)\) is odd if \(D \equiv 5\) or \(7 \pmod 8\), which is proved in this paper in an appendix due to \textit{P. Monsky}, and gives a method for performing numerical calculations of the exact frequency of the Selmer ranks.
    0 references
    algebraic rank
    0 references
    elliptic curve
    0 references
    congruent number
    0 references
    method of descents
    0 references
    Selmer group
    0 references
    Selmer rank
    0 references
    parity condition
    0 references
    numerical calculations
    0 references
    exact frequency of the Selmer ranks
    0 references
    full 2-descent
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers