On the uniqueness of topologies for some constructions of rings and modules (Q1921813): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On strictly minimal topological division rings / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Linear kompakte Moduln und Ringe / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3864620 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Compact rings / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 13:23, 24 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the uniqueness of topologies for some constructions of rings and modules
scientific article

    Statements

    On the uniqueness of topologies for some constructions of rings and modules (English)
    0 references
    11 November 1996
    0 references
    It is well known that upon passage from rings to their superrings a topology given on a ring, even extendible to a corresponding superring, generally extends in a nonunique fashion. For this reason, it is of interest to indicate the cases in which the question of uniqueness is resolved affirmatively. It is the study of this question that the present article addresses. The results of \S 1 are auxiliary and are used in the proof of the results of \S 3, although Theorem 1.7 proven in \S 1 is of interest in its own right. As a corollary (see Corollary 1.9) it implies Nachbin's uniqueness theorem for a topology on a finite-dimensional vector space. In \S 2 we discuss the question of coincidence of topologies on a ring which agree on an ideal of the ring and on the quotient ring by the ideal (see Theorem 2.1). The results of this section are also used in \S 4 in studying the rings with a unique compact topology. In \S 3 we study topologies on subrings of the matrix ring over a given topological ring (see Theorems 3.1 and 3.2). Moreover, in the article we construct a series of examples demonstrating that the constraints imposed in the hypotheses of the theorems are essential and cannot be omitted.
    0 references
    uniqueness theorems
    0 references
    coincidence of topologies
    0 references
    quotient rings
    0 references
    unique compact topology
    0 references
    matrix rings
    0 references
    topological rings
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers