Independent finite sums for \(K_ m\)-free graphs (Q1356037): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A short proof of Hindman's theorem / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Ultrafilters and multidimensional Ramsey theorems / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5589084 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On a metric generalization of Ramsey's theorem / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The Existence of Certain Ultrafilters on N and a Conjecture of Graham and Rothschild / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Finite sums from sequences within cells of a partition of N / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4332286 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Independent finite sums in graphs defined on the natural numbers / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 13:02, 27 May 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Independent finite sums for \(K_ m\)-free graphs |
scientific article |
Statements
Independent finite sums for \(K_ m\)-free graphs (English)
0 references
14 September 1997
0 references
N. Hindman proved in 1974 the following result (see J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A 17, 1-11 (1974; Zbl 0285.05012)): Let \(r\) be a natural number and \(A_1,...,A_r\) be a partition of all natural numbers \(\mathbb{N}\). Then there exist \(i \in \{1,...,r\}\) and a sequence \(\langle x_n \rangle_{n=1} ^\infty\) such that every finite sum from the sequence belongs to \(A_i\). This paper studies analogous questions. It answers a problem of A. Hajnal: Let \(G\) be a triangle-free graph on \(\mathbb{N}\). Does there always exist a sequence in \(\mathbb{N}\) such that the set of all finite sums forms an independent vertex set? The answer is negative. However the paper also contains positive results on analogous questions. For example, if for some \(m \in \mathbb{N}\) the graph \(G\) contains no complete bipartite graph \(K_{m,m}\) then the answer for the previous problem is affirmative.
0 references
Hindman theorem
0 references
finite sums
0 references
independent sets in graphs
0 references
cancellative semigroups
0 references
\(\beta S\) semigroup
0 references