A constructive formulation of Gleason's theorem (Q1372943): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Constructivism in mathematics. An introduction. Volume I / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Gleason's theorem is not constructively provable / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3751554 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An elementary proof of Gleason's theorem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4747057 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 18:52, 27 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A constructive formulation of Gleason's theorem
scientific article

    Statements

    A constructive formulation of Gleason's theorem (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    4 November 1997
    0 references
    The paper is devoted to a constructive reformulation of Gleason's Theorem, classically equivalent to the standard formulation, such that for this form of the theorem Hellman's counterexample [\textit{G. Hellman}, J. Philos. Logic 22, No. 2, 193-203 (1993; Zbl 0785.03041)], is not valid. However, the constructive proof of Gleason's Theorem is not known yet. Gleason's Theorem is a fundamental theorem for representation of states in quantum mechanics. Its constructive form would have great mathematical and philosophical consequences.
    0 references
    constructive mathematics
    0 references
    Gleason's Theorem
    0 references
    Hellman's counterexample
    0 references
    representation of states in quantum mechanics
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references