Complex predicates and logics for properties and relations (Q1267085): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Completeness in the theory of properties, relations, and propositions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Property theory: The type-free approach \(v\). The Church approach / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4722029 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5639713 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Leibniz on Intension and Extension / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 15:29, 28 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Complex predicates and logics for properties and relations
scientific article

    Statements

    Complex predicates and logics for properties and relations (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    7 March 1999
    0 references
    A logic is introduced for dealing with predicates and relations and their deontations. This is a standard first-order language, with the addition of an operator \(\lambda\) that forms predicates from formulas. This language is interpreted over what the author calls intensional relational structures\(\). An intensional relational structure is an ordered quadruple \(\langle{\mathcal D}_{\mathcal I},{\mathcal D}_{\mathcal R},{\mathcal O},\text{ext} \rangle\) where the first two terms comprise a domain of individuals and a domain of primitive relations, the third contains a number of ``relation building'' operations, and the last represents an extension assignment that maps each relation into an extension. Distinct relations may be mapped into the same extension. In this logic some complex predicates have denotations, while some may not. The approach is simple, and throws considerable light on some philosophical issues concerning predicates and relations. The author shows how various philosophical assumptions about the denotata of relations give rise to significant algebras of relations.
    0 references
    complex relations
    0 references
    complex predicates
    0 references
    semantics
    0 references
    intensional relational structures
    0 references
    algebras of relations
    0 references

    Identifiers