Set theory -- from Cantor's heaven to the first theory among equals (Q1279498): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE CONTINUUM HYPOTHESIS / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3912532 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Foundations of set theory / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Consistency of the Axiom of Choice and of the Generalized Continuum-Hypothesis / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the restricted ordinal theorem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Georg cantor's influence on bertrand russell / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5800864 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Accessible Independence Results for Peano Arithmetic / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Literature as medium in a cultural history of mathematics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3317659 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4885263 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 18:21, 28 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Set theory -- from Cantor's heaven to the first theory among equals
scientific article

    Statements

    Set theory -- from Cantor's heaven to the first theory among equals (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    10 February 1999
    0 references
    Addressing a wider audience the author describes the development of set theory and of its logical foundations as a sequence of catastrophes (such as paradoxes, theorems of Löwenheim-Skolem, Gödel) and of attempted rescues. The nature of formal definitions and their role in the foundations of mathematics are considered in some detail. The goal of the paper is to explain how it is possible that set theory as a universal ontology of mathematics failed but the language of sets is successful in mathematical practice.
    0 references
    0 references
    set theory
    0 references