Pivotal players and the characterization of influence (Q1581192): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Large nonanonymous repeated games / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A note on the probability of casting a decisive vote / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: When are nonanonymous players negligible? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Noncooperative price taking in large dynamic markets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Asymmetric Information Bargaining Problems with Many Agents / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Implementation in differential information economies / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Pollution claim settlements under private information / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Anonymous repeated games with a large number of players and random outcomes / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 13:03, 30 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Pivotal players and the characterization of influence
scientific article

    Statements

    Pivotal players and the characterization of influence (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    14 January 2001
    0 references
    This paper considers an \(N\)-player game whose collective outcome may be influenced by players differently. The strategic behaviour in such games often depends on the individual players' beliefs about their influence on a collective outcome. In settings such as the provision of public goods and allocations in the presence of externalities, voting, implementation, auction and repeated games, only the players who believe their actions will be pivotal, take into account the impact of their actions on the collective outcome, whereas the other players tend to behave myopically. The authors provide tight upper bounds on the number of pivotal players and on average influence. These bounds are uniform over all mechanisms and actions profiles and the bounds are attained when the mechanism is a majority rule.
    0 references
    influence
    0 references
    pivotal player
    0 references
    voting
    0 references
    auctions
    0 references
    repeated games
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references