Orthogonal sequences in non-Archimedean locally convex spaces (Q5935896): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Some remarks on boundedness of linear transformations from Banach spaces into Orlicz spaces of Lebesgue-Bochner measurable functions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5655869 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Orlicz-Pettis property in \(p\)-adic analysis / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: \(p\)-adic barrelledness and spaces of countable type / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4179411 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4722678 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3196851 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5342665 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 17:48, 3 June 2024

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1611979
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Orthogonal sequences in non-Archimedean locally convex spaces
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1611979

    Statements

    Orthogonal sequences in non-Archimedean locally convex spaces (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    28 June 2001
    0 references
    Let \(E\) be a Hausdorff locally convex space over a non-Archimedean valued complete field \(K\). A sequence \(x_1,x_2,\dots\) in \(E\) is called `orthogonal' (De Grande-De Kimpe, 1972) if there is a base \({\mathcal P}\) of continuous seminorms such that for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\), all \(\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_n\in K\), all \(p\in {\mathcal P}\), \(p(\sum^n_{i=1}\lambda_i x_i)= \max_i p(\lambda_ix_i)\). The main result of the paper is the following characterization of compactoids. A bounded subset \(X\) of \(E\) is a compactoid iff each `orthogonal' sequence in \(X\) tends to \(0\). Next, this fact is being to find partial answers to the following questions. 1. If \(E\) is metrizable, does it have an `orthogonal' basic sequence? 2. If \(E\) is Fréchet, of countable type, does it have an `orthogonal' base? Note: Recently, \textit{W. Sliwa} managed to provide full answers [`yes' on question 1, see Indeg. Math., New Ser. 11, No. 3, 463-466 (2000; review below); `no' in question 2, see ``Examples of non-Archimedean nuclear Fréchet spaces method a Schauder basis'', to appear in Indeg. Math., New Ser.].
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    orthogonal sequence
    0 references
    Schauder base
    0 references
    basic sequence
    0 references
    non-Archimedean valued complete field
    0 references
    characterization of compactoids
    0 references