The quincunx: History and mathematics (Q5944066): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5629004 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4478688 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5341273 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3805615 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3803965 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Francis Galton's account of the invention of correlation / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 20:04, 3 June 2024

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1649155
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The quincunx: History and mathematics
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1649155

    Statements

    The quincunx: History and mathematics (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    13 June 2002
    0 references
    A quincunx is an arrangement of five objects, four of them at the vertices of a square or rectangle, and the fifth at its centre. About 1873 Fr. Galton invented a simple device which he called quincunx. It showed that shot, falling through an array of pins, collected in a figure resembling a normal curve. The authors describe Galton's work at the time; argue that the quincunx was his natural-scientific approach to the central limit theorem (CLT); dwell on the generalizations of that device (Galton himself; Pearson, in 1895); and provide an appropriate mathematical background. They did not remark that the conditions for the CLT established at the time were less restrictive than Galton thought (p. 149) and their expression (p. 159) ``the percentage of balls \dots converges to infinity'' was unfortunate. That Galton invented identification by fingerprints (p. 144) is wrong: he had predecessors, see ``Fingerprints'' in New Enc. Brit., 15th ed., vol. 4.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    F. Galton
    0 references
    quincunx
    0 references
    0 references