Comparison of non-commutative 2- and \(p\)-summing operators from \(B(l_2)\) into \(OH\) (Q1848666): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Tensor Products of Operator Spaces II / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The standard dual of an operator space / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Tensor products of operator spaces / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On matricially normed spaces / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A New Approach to Operator Spaces / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the Abstract Characterization of Operator Spaces / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Comparing gaussian and Rademacher cotype for operators on the space of continuous functions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the Duality of Operator Spaces / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Absolut p-summierende Abbildungen in normierten Räumen / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The operator Hilbert space 𝑂𝐻, complex interpolation and tensor norms / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4215796 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Subspaces of \(C^ *\)-algebras / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 17:25, 4 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Comparison of non-commutative 2- and \(p\)-summing operators from \(B(l_2)\) into \(OH\)
scientific article

    Statements

    Comparison of non-commutative 2- and \(p\)-summing operators from \(B(l_2)\) into \(OH\) (English)
    0 references
    11 September 2003
    0 references
    Summary: In the theory of \(p\)-summing operators studied by Pietsch we know that \[ \pi_2(C(K),H)= \pi_p(C(K), H) \] for any Hilbert space \(H\) and any \(p\) such that \(2<p<+ \infty\). In this paper, we prove that this equality is not true for the same notion generalized by Junge and Pisier to operator spaces, i.e., \(\pi_{l_2} (B(l_2),OH) (=\pi_2^0(B(l_2),OH)) \neq\pi_{l_p} (B(l_2), OH)\).
    0 references
    operator spaces
    0 references
    completely bounded operators
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references