The index of nonmonic polynomials (Q1866443): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Finiteness Theorems for Binary Forms with Given Discriminant / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3139838 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Reduction of Binary Cubic and Quartic Forms / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the density of discriminants of cubic fields. II / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Computing integral points on elliptic curves / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4510772 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5330699 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5734388 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 13:56, 5 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The index of nonmonic polynomials
scientific article

    Statements

    The index of nonmonic polynomials (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    5 June 2003
    0 references
    Let \(R \subset \mathcal R\) be integral domains and \(P = a_0 x^n + \dots +a_n\) a polynomial over \(R\). Put \(P_0=1\) and \(P_i=a_0 x^i + \dots + a_i\) for \(1 \leq i \leq n-1\), assume that \(\theta \in \mathcal R\) is a root of \(P\) and define \(R[P_k(\theta)]\), the invariant ring of \(P\), as the \(R\)-module generated by \(P_i(\theta),\;0 \leq i \leq n-1\); these ideas go back to R. Dedekind and A. Hurwitz. If \(P\) is irreducible, the discriminant of \(R[P_k(\theta)]\) over \(R\) equals \(\text{disc} (P)\). With these ideas the author generalizes the notion of index to nonintegral elements of an algebraic number field \(K\) and asks whether there exists some \(\theta \in K\) with index \(1\), i.e. for which \(\theta \) does \(\mathbb Z [P_k(\theta)]\) equal the ring of integers of \(K\). For cubic number fields this question is answered affirmatively (in contrast to the result for the classical index), for higher degrees such a \(\theta\) need no longer exist. Generalizing a result of \textit{M.-N. Gras} [J. Number Theory 23, 347--353 (1986; Zbl 0564.12008)] it is shown that almost all cyclic extensions of \(\mathbb Q\) do not have elements with index \(1\). Furthermore it is shown that with increasing conductor this index goes to \(\infty\).
    0 references
    0 references
    invariants
    0 references
    cyclic number field
    0 references
    discriminant
    0 references

    Identifiers