The index of nonmonic polynomials (Q1866443): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Finiteness Theorems for Binary Forms with Given Discriminant / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3139838 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Reduction of Binary Cubic and Quartic Forms / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On the density of discriminants of cubic fields. II / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Computing integral points on elliptic curves / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4510772 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5330699 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5734388 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 13:56, 5 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | The index of nonmonic polynomials |
scientific article |
Statements
The index of nonmonic polynomials (English)
0 references
5 June 2003
0 references
Let \(R \subset \mathcal R\) be integral domains and \(P = a_0 x^n + \dots +a_n\) a polynomial over \(R\). Put \(P_0=1\) and \(P_i=a_0 x^i + \dots + a_i\) for \(1 \leq i \leq n-1\), assume that \(\theta \in \mathcal R\) is a root of \(P\) and define \(R[P_k(\theta)]\), the invariant ring of \(P\), as the \(R\)-module generated by \(P_i(\theta),\;0 \leq i \leq n-1\); these ideas go back to R. Dedekind and A. Hurwitz. If \(P\) is irreducible, the discriminant of \(R[P_k(\theta)]\) over \(R\) equals \(\text{disc} (P)\). With these ideas the author generalizes the notion of index to nonintegral elements of an algebraic number field \(K\) and asks whether there exists some \(\theta \in K\) with index \(1\), i.e. for which \(\theta \) does \(\mathbb Z [P_k(\theta)]\) equal the ring of integers of \(K\). For cubic number fields this question is answered affirmatively (in contrast to the result for the classical index), for higher degrees such a \(\theta\) need no longer exist. Generalizing a result of \textit{M.-N. Gras} [J. Number Theory 23, 347--353 (1986; Zbl 0564.12008)] it is shown that almost all cyclic extensions of \(\mathbb Q\) do not have elements with index \(1\). Furthermore it is shown that with increasing conductor this index goes to \(\infty\).
0 references
invariants
0 references
cyclic number field
0 references
discriminant
0 references