Smash product of pointed objects in lextensive categories (Q1413885): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Modularity and descent / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Introduction to extensive and distributive categories / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5586461 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5639839 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 12:36, 6 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Smash product of pointed objects in lextensive categories
scientific article

    Statements

    Smash product of pointed objects in lextensive categories (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    17 November 2003
    0 references
    This paper proposes a categorical generalization of the (topological) concept of smash product. For a category \({\mathcal X}\) with finite limits and (enough) colimits, one can define the smash product \((X,p)\wedge(Y,q)\) of the objects \((X,p)\) and \((Y,q)\) of the pointed category (1\(\downarrow{\mathcal X})\) as the cokernel of the canonical morphism from \((X,p)+(Y,q)\) to \((X,p)\times(Y,q)\). The authors show that if the finite coproducts (in \({\mathcal X}\)) are pullback stable and all functors A\(\times(-)\colon{\mathcal X}\to{\mathcal X}\) (A\(\in{\mathcal X}\)) preserve certain types of pushouts, then this definition determines a canonical (symmetric and distributive with respect to coproducts) structure on (1\(\downarrow{\mathcal X}\)). If, in addition, \({\mathcal X}\) is lextensive, then it can be recovered from this structure (as the category of objects with counit in (1\(\downarrow{\mathcal X}\))). All these conditions are satisfied, in particular, in lextensive cartesian closed categories with finite colimits, the category of groupoids, and all pretoposes. Several examples are considered in order to evaluate the necessity of the various conditions.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    smash product
    0 references
    monoidal categories
    0 references
    pointed categories
    0 references
    objects with counit
    0 references
    0 references