Shouldn’t there be an antithesis to quantization? (Q4833475): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On Quantizing Nilpotent and Solvable Basic Algebras / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An obstruction to quantizing compact symplectic manifolds / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the Groenewold–Van Hove problem for R2n / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On quantizing \(T^*S^1\) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Obstruction results in quantization theory / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Groenewold-Van Hove Theorem for $S^2$ / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the principles of elementary quantum mechanics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The rigged Hilbert space of the free Hamiltonian / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Rigged Hilbert space approach to the Schrödinger equation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4532409 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Pauli's theorem and quantum canonical pairs: the consistency of a bounded, self–adjoint time operator canonically conjugate to a Hamiltonian with non–empty point spectrum / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 16:51, 7 June 2024

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2123047
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Shouldn’t there be an antithesis to quantization?
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2123047

    Statements