Hook immanantal inequalities for trees explained (Q1381277): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q126351602, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1718107978296 |
||
Property / Wikidata QID | |||
Property / Wikidata QID: Q126351602 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 13:14, 11 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Hook immanantal inequalities for trees explained |
scientific article |
Statements
Hook immanantal inequalities for trees explained (English)
0 references
31 August 1998
0 references
Let \(\overline d_k\) denote the normalized hook immanant corresponding to the partition \((k, 1^{n-k})\) of \(n.\) It was proved by \textit{P. Heyfron} [Linear Multilinear Algebra 24, No. 1, 65-78 (1988; Zbl 0678.15009)] that the family of immanantal inequalities \[ \det A = \overline d_1(A) \leq \overline d_2(A) \leq \cdots \leq \overline d_n(A)= \text{per }A \] holds for all positive semidefinite Hermitian matrices \(A.\) The authors improve the above bound to \[ \overline{d}_{k-1}(L(T)) \leq \frac{k-2}{k-1} \overline{d}_k (L(T)) \] for \(2 \leq k \leq n\) whenever \(L(T)\) is the Laplacian matrix of a tree \(T.\) Heyfron's proof technique for the above result relied too much on recursive relations and it didn't give any insight into the correctness of the result. In this paper, the authors give an easy and elegant proof using the notion of vertex orientations. This also helps them to obtain an improved bound \[ 0 \leq \frac{1}{k-1} [ \overline{d}_k(L(T)) - \overline{d}_k(L(S(n))) ] \leq \frac{k-2}{k-1} \overline{d}_k (L(T)) - \overline{d}_{k-1} (L(T)) \] where \(S(n)\) is the star on \(n\) vertices.
0 references
positive semidefinite Hermitian matrix
0 references
hook partition
0 references
hook immanant
0 references
vertex orientation
0 references
Laplacian matrix of a tree
0 references
immanantal inequalities
0 references