On UMV-estimators in survey sampling (Q1393905): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3227961 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5725139 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Review of the Contributions Towards a Unified Theory of Sampling from Finite Populations / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Hyper-Admissibility and Optimum Estimators for Sampling Finite Populations / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Admissible Estimates for any Sampling Design / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An Optimum Property of the Horvitz-Thomson Estimate / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the axioms of sample formation and their bearing on the construction of linear estimators in sampling theory for finite inverses / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3250109 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5582777 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5594930 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 14:14, 12 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On UMV-estimators in survey sampling
scientific article

    Statements

    On UMV-estimators in survey sampling (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1973
    0 references
    When a sample has been drawn from a finite population in order to estimate the population total of a certain characteristic, there are many unbiased estimators to chose among and even restriction to- linear unbiased estimators does usually not single out a unique estimator. In such a case it seems natural to apply some optimality criterion, e.g. minimization of the variance. A famous theorem of Godambe states that the class of linear unbiased estimators does in general not contain an estimator with uniformly minimal variance; here `in general' means `provided the sampling design is not a unicluster design'. In the present paper various previously published proofs of this theorem are critically examined and a new proof is offered. Further some comments are given on the concept of necessary bestness, due to Prabhu-Ajgaonkar.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references