Careful usage of pessimistic values is needed in multiple objectives optimization (Q1060964): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Linear programming with multiple objective functions: Step method (stem) / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3221778 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Interactive Sequential Goal Programming / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3917910 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The set of all nondominated solutions in linear cases and a multicriteria simplex method / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 17:24, 14 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Careful usage of pessimistic values is needed in multiple objectives optimization |
scientific article |
Statements
Careful usage of pessimistic values is needed in multiple objectives optimization (English)
0 references
1985
0 references
Attention is drawn to the fact that so-called pessimistic values are not lower bounds for the objective function values on the efficient solution set. Two counterexamples, to stress this point, are presented.
0 references
multiple objectives
0 references
nondominated solutions
0 references
efficient solutions
0 references
Pareto solutions
0 references
pessimistic values
0 references
lower bounds
0 references
counterexamples
0 references