Optimality of random allocation design for the control of accidental bias in sequential experiments (Q1063360): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Design for the Control of Selection Bias / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Some Restricted randomization rules in sequential designs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The use of random allocation for the control of selection bias / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the random allocation design for the control of selection bias in sequential experiments / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 17:57, 14 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Optimality of random allocation design for the control of accidental bias in sequential experiments
scientific article

    Statements

    Optimality of random allocation design for the control of accidental bias in sequential experiments (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1985
    0 references
    In comparing two treatments, suppose the suitable subjects arrive sequentially and must be treated at once. Known or unknown to the experimenter there may be nuisance factors systematically affecting the subjects. Accidental bias is a measure of the influence of these factors in the analysis of data. We show in this paper that the random allocation design minimizes the accidental bias among all designs that allocate n, out of 2n, subjects to each treatment and do not prefer either treatment in the assignment. When the final imbalance is allowed to be nonzero, optimal and efficient designs are given. In particular the random allocation design is shown to be very efficient in this broader setup.
    0 references
    clinical trial
    0 references
    selection bias
    0 references
    truncated binomial design
    0 references
    comparing two treatments
    0 references
    nuisance factors
    0 references
    Accidental bias
    0 references
    random allocation design
    0 references

    Identifiers