Optimality of random allocation design for the control of accidental bias in sequential experiments (Q1063360): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Design for the Control of Selection Bias / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Some Restricted randomization rules in sequential designs / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The use of random allocation for the control of selection bias / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On the random allocation design for the control of selection bias in sequential experiments / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 17:57, 14 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Optimality of random allocation design for the control of accidental bias in sequential experiments |
scientific article |
Statements
Optimality of random allocation design for the control of accidental bias in sequential experiments (English)
0 references
1985
0 references
In comparing two treatments, suppose the suitable subjects arrive sequentially and must be treated at once. Known or unknown to the experimenter there may be nuisance factors systematically affecting the subjects. Accidental bias is a measure of the influence of these factors in the analysis of data. We show in this paper that the random allocation design minimizes the accidental bias among all designs that allocate n, out of 2n, subjects to each treatment and do not prefer either treatment in the assignment. When the final imbalance is allowed to be nonzero, optimal and efficient designs are given. In particular the random allocation design is shown to be very efficient in this broader setup.
0 references
clinical trial
0 references
selection bias
0 references
truncated binomial design
0 references
comparing two treatments
0 references
nuisance factors
0 references
Accidental bias
0 references
random allocation design
0 references