A limited capacity rehearsal model for psychophysical judgements applied to magnitude estimation (Q1083406): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A fixed rehearsal capacity interpretation of limits on absolute identification performance / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5512461 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Two classes of models for magnitude estimation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The response ratio hypothesis for magnitude estimation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Joint independent random utility models where one of the choice structures satisfies the strict utility model / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5556830 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 16:15, 17 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A limited capacity rehearsal model for psychophysical judgements applied to magnitude estimation
scientific article

    Statements

    A limited capacity rehearsal model for psychophysical judgements applied to magnitude estimation (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1986
    0 references
    A generalization of \textit{A. A. Marley} and \textit{V. T. Cook}'s rehearsal model, Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 37, 136-151 (1984; Zbl 0558.92016), is applied to the magnitude estimation data of \textit{J. C. Baird}, \textit{D. M. Green}, and \textit{R. D. Luce}, J. Experimental Psychol.: Human perception and performance 6, 277-289 (1980), and of \textit{J. C. Green}, \textit{R. D. Luce} and \textit{A. F. Smith}, Perception and Psychophysics 27, 483-488 (1980). The data analyses that are considered are: the mean magnitude estimates and response variances, each as a function of the stimulus intensity; the coefficient of variation of the response and of the response ratio on adjacent trials and the correlation coefficient of the log responses on adjacent trials, each as a function of the difference in the stimulus intensities on the adjacent trials. Several versions of the model are discussed, with each version yielding good fits to different aspects of the data.
    0 references
    mean magnitude estimates
    0 references
    response variances
    0 references
    stimulus intensity
    0 references
    coefficient of variation of the response
    0 references
    response ratio on adjacent trials
    0 references
    correlation coefficient of the log responses on adjacent trials
    0 references

    Identifiers