A note on the efficiency of the Cochrane-Orcutt estimator of the AR(1) regression model (Q1093300): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Singular Equation Systems with Autoregressive Disturbances / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Efficiency of Least-Squares Estimation of Linear Trend when Residuals Are Autocorrelated / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Quadratic Forms and Idempotent Matrices with Random Elements / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3664270 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Transformation Used to Circumvent the Problem of Autocorrelation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the Retention of the First Observations in Serial Correlation Adjustment of Regression Models / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Estimating the autocorrelated error model with trended data / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 12:54, 18 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A note on the efficiency of the Cochrane-Orcutt estimator of the AR(1) regression model
scientific article

    Statements

    A note on the efficiency of the Cochrane-Orcutt estimator of the AR(1) regression model (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1987
    0 references
    This paper shows that the Cochrane-Orcutt transformation which deletes the initial observation of the AR(1) regression model with known autocorrelation is strictly less efficient than a weighted generalized least squares estimator which gives the initial observation less weight than the true model requires, and may be more or less efficient than an estimator which gives the initial observation more weight than required. It also shows that the estimator based on the Cochrane-Orcutt transformation is strictly less efficient than one based on the Prais- Winsten transformation, if the AR(1) process has a finite past. These results give further support to the conclusion that, whenever possible, the estimator based on Prais-Winsten transformation should be used.
    0 references
    0 references
    Cochrane-Orcutt transformation
    0 references
    AR(1) regression model
    0 references
    known autocorrelation
    0 references
    weighted generalized least squares estimator
    0 references
    Prais- Winsten transformation
    0 references