Constructing inverse monoids from small categories (Q1096714): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Equivalences between \(\mathcal D\)-categories of inverse monoids / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Class of d-Simple Semigroups / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4059108 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The \(\mathcal D\)-category of a semigroup / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The \({\mathcal D}\)-category of a monoid / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Cohomology of inverse semigroups / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3944773 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3037674 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5508993 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3337662 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 12:58, 18 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Constructing inverse monoids from small categories
scientific article

    Statements

    Constructing inverse monoids from small categories (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1987
    0 references
    The concept of a division category D(S) for a given semigroup S was introduced by the author [Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 157, 1-66 (1975; Zbl 0303.20048)], and a variation was developed by \textit{M. Loganathan} [J. Algebra 70, 375-393 (1981; Zbl 0465.20063)]. The first section of this paper begins by defining an abstract division category (ADC) to be a pair (D,I), where D is a small category having finite pushouts all of whose morphisms are epics, and I is a distinguished object such that Hom(I,X) never vanishes for any object in D. The main result in this section is Theorem 1.15 asserting that Loganathan pairs always yield an ADC. The second section presents the main construction of this work: for each pair (D,I) an inverse monoid of fractions, S[D,I], is constructed. Theorem 2.2 is the main result in this section and asserts that S[D,I] is an inverse monoid. A second result, Theorem 2.5, asserts that equivalence of two pairs, (D,I)\(\cong (D',I')\), induces isomorphism of the derived monoids, S[D,I]\(\cong S[D',I']\). In section 3 it is proved that there exists a canonical isomorphism \(\Theta\) : \(S\cong S[D(s),1]\) for a given inverse monoid S, and that two inverse monoids are isomorphic iff their induced division categories are pair equivalent. Theorem 4.4 and Corollary 4.5 provide noncanonial equivalences of (D,I) with (D(S),1), where \(S=S[D,I]\) and D(S) is the Loganathan category of S. In the fifth section the functor \(\Sigma_ 0: D\to INV\) from the category of abstract division categories to the category of inverse monoids is studied. The last section contains a brief study of (dual) symmetrical inverse monoids in full generality.
    0 references
    abstract division category
    0 references
    small category
    0 references
    finite pushouts
    0 references
    Loganathan pairs
    0 references
    inverse monoid of fractions
    0 references

    Identifiers