Multiprocessor scheduling: Combining LPT and MULTIFIT (Q1109673): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An Application of Bin-Packing to Multiprocessor Scheduling / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Tighter Bounds for the Multifit Processor Scheduling Algorithm / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Evaluation of a MULTIFIT-based scheduling algorithm / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4198056 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bounds for Certain Multiprocessing Anomalies / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bounds on Multiprocessing Timing Anomalies / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 19:13, 18 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Multiprocessor scheduling: Combining LPT and MULTIFIT
scientific article

    Statements

    Multiprocessor scheduling: Combining LPT and MULTIFIT (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1988
    0 references
    The paper considers the problem of scheduling a set of n independent jobs on m identical machines with the objective of minimizing the total finishing time. Two well-known heuristic algorithms, namely LPT and MULTIFIT, are reviewed with respect to their advantages and drawbacks. A new algorithm called COMBINE is proposed which uses the result of LPT as the incumbent and then applies MULTIFIT with fewer iterations. The performance of the proposed new algorithm is better than that of LPT becauses it uses LPT as an incumbent. Furthermore, it is shown that the error bound of the new algorithm is never worse than that of MULTIFIT. Although it is not known for the general multiprocessor problem how much improvement is obtained in the error bound for COMBINE over MULTIFIT, it is shown that the improvement is significant for the two-processor system. Empirical comparison results are finally provided.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    multiprocessor scheduling
    0 references
    comparison of algorithms
    0 references
    independent jobs
    0 references
    identical machines
    0 references
    total finishing time
    0 references
    heuristic algorithms
    0 references
    error bound
    0 references
    improvement
    0 references