Wilson's theorem for economic environments and continuous social preferences (Q1825101): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q2783476 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Existence of equilibrium actions and of equilibrium. A note on the 'new' existence theorems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Existence of Social Welfare Functions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Social welfare functions for economic environments with and without the Pareto principle / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3223417 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Arrovian theorems with private alternatives domains and selfish individuals / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Can equity be purchased at the expense of efficiency? An axiomatic inquiry / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Arrow's theorem for economic environments and effective social preferences / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Social choice in economic environments / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the existence of maximal elements / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 11:09, 20 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Wilson's theorem for economic environments and continuous social preferences
scientific article

    Statements

    Wilson's theorem for economic environments and continuous social preferences (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1989
    0 references
    \textit{R. Wilson} [J. Econ. Theory 5, 478-486 (1972)] proved a generalization of Arrow's impossibility theorem for finite sets of alternatives and agents: every non-imposed and non-null (not all alternatives equivalent) social welfare function that satisfies Arrow's independence axiom is dictatorial or inversely dictatorial. The Pareto criterion is not required. Other authors proved this result for sets of alternatives consisting of allocations of strictly positive commodity bundles and with a finite set of agents with selfish individual preferences. In the present paper it is proved that, after adding an assumption on the continuity of individual preferences, the result also holds in the closure of the positive orthant and with an infinite society. It follows as a corollary that some individual gets a zero vector if the social preference is non-null and non-imposed.
    0 references
    0 references
    continuous social preferences
    0 references
    Arrow's impossibility theorem
    0 references
    infinite society
    0 references