The probability of survival for the biased voter model in a random environment (Q909369): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4197800 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3216028 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4114551 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the growth of one dimensional contact processes / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3217388 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4040029 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3966879 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5674160 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5185817 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Limiting Behavior of a One-Dimensional Random Walk in a Random Medium / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Random walks in a random environment / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 12:30, 20 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The probability of survival for the biased voter model in a random environment
scientific article

    Statements

    The probability of survival for the biased voter model in a random environment (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1990
    0 references
    A biased voter model in a random environment in \({\mathbb{Z}}\) is studied. The influence of a nearest neighbour voter has a constant rate \(\lambda\), if one has opinion ``against'' and the neighboured voter opinion ``for'', but has i.i.d. rates at the different positions in the opposite case. Exponential decay of the survival probability is proved for \(\lambda\) converging to the critical value \(\lambda_ c\). There follows that the corresponding critical exponent \(\beta\) is \(\infty\), in contrast to nonrandom environment, where \(\beta =1\). The proof uses the random walks in random environments, performed by the left and right boundaries of the set of affirmative voters.
    0 references
    probability of survival
    0 references
    biased voter model
    0 references
    random environment
    0 references
    critical exponent
    0 references
    random walks
    0 references
    random environments
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers