Is the Born approximation good for solving the inverse problem when the potential is small? (Q917823): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3746172 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Stable solutions of some ill‐posed problems / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3805203 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Recovery of the potential from fixed-energy scattering data / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 09:08, 21 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Is the Born approximation good for solving the inverse problem when the potential is small? |
scientific article |
Statements
Is the Born approximation good for solving the inverse problem when the potential is small? (English)
0 references
1990
0 references
The author makes a few remarks concerning the Born approximation in the inverse scattering problem associated to the operator \(-\Delta +q(x)\) in \({\mathbb{R}}^ 3\). He notices that the scattering amplitude A equals its Born approximation \(A_ B\) only if \(q\equiv 0\), and that all the potentials obtained from the scattering amplitude by a suitable inverse Fourier formula, differ from q by a small quantity when \(A-A_ B\) is small.
0 references
Born approximation
0 references
inverse scattering
0 references
scattering amplitude
0 references