A note on enumerative counting (Q809598): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3999199 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Addendum to: Non-deterministic exponential time has two-prower interactive protocols / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bounded queries to SAT and the Boolean hierarchy / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Enumerative counting is hard / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Computational Complexity of Probabilistic Turing Machines / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3259107 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Structural complexity theory: Recent surprises / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3798240 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On Approximation Algorithms for # P / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The complexity of computing the permanent / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Complexity of Enumeration and Reliability Problems / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 09:06, 24 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A note on enumerative counting
scientific article

    Statements

    A note on enumerative counting (English)
    0 references
    1991
    0 references
    The authors show that {\#}P cannot be enumeratively approximated unless every {\#}P-function is computable in polynomial time. An enumerative approximation of a function f is a polynomial time computable function g such that g(x) computes a list of numbers containing f(x) as one of its members. In their proof the authors show how to construct from any given enumerative approximation of {\#}SAT a polynomial-time algorithm for {\#}SAT. This algorithm uses manipulations of permanents exploiting the fundamental result of \textit{L. G. Valiant} [Theor. Comput. Sci. 8, 189-201 (1979; Zbl 0415.68008)] that permanent evaluation is {\#}P-hard. As the authors remark a different proof of their result has been given independently by \textit{S. Toda} building upon an approach of \textit{R. Amir, R. Beigel} and \textit{W. Gasarch} [Structure in Complexity Theory, IEEE Computer Society Press, 232-243 (1990)].
    0 references
    relations among complexity classes
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers