\(A\)-compactness and minimal subalgebras of \(C(X)\) (Q812477): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On a class of subalgebras of $C(X)$ and the intersection of their free maximal ideals / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4531324 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Prime and maximal ideals in subrings of C(X) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Intermediate algebras between \(C^*(X)\) and \(C(X)\) as rings of fractions of \(C^*(X)\) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4092470 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On a class of subalgebras of C(X) with applications to βX\X / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Maximal Ideals in Subalgebras of C(X) / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 10:35, 24 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
\(A\)-compactness and minimal subalgebras of \(C(X)\)
scientific article

    Statements

    \(A\)-compactness and minimal subalgebras of \(C(X)\) (English)
    0 references
    24 January 2006
    0 references
    Let \(X\) be a Tychonoff space and \(\Sigma(X)\) denote the set of subalgebras \(A\) of the ring \(C(X)\) of continuous mappings from \(X\) into the real field \(\mathbb R\). A maximal ideal \(M\) of \(A\) is said to be real in case \(A/M = \mathbb R\); otherwise \(M\) is hyperreal. We say that \(X\) is \(A\)-compact in case \(M\) real implies \(M\) fixed. Thus \(X\) realcompact implies that \(X\) is \(C\)-compact. The following question has been floating for some time. If \(X\) is realcompact, then is there a minimal member \(A\in \Sigma(X)\) such that \(X\) is \(A\)-compact? \textit{S. K. Acharyya, K. C. Chattopadhyay}, and \textit{D. P. Ghosh} [Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 125, 611--615 (1997; Zbl 0858.54014)] defined a pre-order on \(\Sigma(X)\) different from set inclusion which provides an affirmative answer. They also conjectured that the answer is generally negative with respect to set inclusion. In the present paper the authors show that if \(X\) is realcompact but not compact, then the answer is indeed negative with respect to set inclusion.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    minimal subalgebra
    0 references
    realcompact space
    0 references
    Stone-Čech compactification
    0 references
    convex ring
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references