No feasible monotone interpolation for simple combinatorial reasoning (Q1575265): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q126812394, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1719448105926
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q126812394 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 02:33, 27 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
No feasible monotone interpolation for simple combinatorial reasoning
scientific article

    Statements

    No feasible monotone interpolation for simple combinatorial reasoning (English)
    0 references
    21 August 2000
    0 references
    The feasible monotone interpolation method has been one of the main tools to prove the exponential lower bounds for relatively weak propositional systems. \textit{N. H. Arai} [Theor. Comput. Sci. 170, No. 1-2, 129-144 (1996; Zbl 0874.03065)] introduced a simple combinatorial reasoning system, GCNF+permutation, as a candidate for an automatizable, though powerful, propositional calculus. We show that the monotone interpolation method is not applicable to prove the superpolynomial lower bounds for Simple Combinatorial Reasoning. At the same time, we show that cutting planes, Hilbert's nullstellensatz and the polynomial calculus do not \(p\)-simulate simple combinatorial reasoning.
    0 references
    0 references
    automated theorem proving
    0 references
    proof complexity
    0 references
    Craig's interpolation theorem
    0 references
    proof theory
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references