Triumph over your rivals in dynamic oligopoly (Q949037): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Controlling chaos through growth rate adjustment / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The long-run benefits of chaos to oligopolistic firms / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Profitability analysis of price-taking strategy in disequilibrium / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Cournot Oligopoly and Competitive Behaviour / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Multistability and cyclic attractors in duopoly games / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 17:20, 28 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Triumph over your rivals in dynamic oligopoly |
scientific article |
Statements
Triumph over your rivals in dynamic oligopoly (English)
0 references
16 October 2008
0 references
Summary: Challenging the conventional belief that sophistication in strategy is always better, it was foundby the author [On the incentive for price-taking behavior. Manag. Decis. 40, No. 7, 682--692, (2002)] that a price-taker who adopts the Cobweb strategy yields higher profits than those who adopt more sophisticated strategies. This study explores the possibility of improving further the relative profit advantage that the price-taker has over its counterparts through incorporating the growth-rate adjustment strategy. A linear heterogeneous oligopoly model is used to illustrate the merits of such strategy in the case of disequilibrium. It is shown in theory and supported with numerical simulations that the adoption of growth-rate adjustment strategy together with price-taking strategy confers on the price-taker the stabilization power in a dynamically unstable market in addition to better relative performance in terms of major performance measures.
0 references