Proposition II (Book I) of Newton's \(Principia\) (Q1018493): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5821390 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4942167 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5344150 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3997378 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4510158 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3994751 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On newton's proof that inverse-square orbits must be conics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Newton and the notion of limit / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Newton's argument for Proposition 1 of the \textit{Principia} / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The importance of being equivalent: Newton's two models of one-body motion / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Newton's interpretation of Newton's second law / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Force, deflection, and time: Proposition VI of Newton's \textit{Principia} / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3410818 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The prehistory of the <i>Principia</i> from 1664 to 1686 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 13:48, 1 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Proposition II (Book I) of Newton's \(Principia\)
scientific article

    Statements

    Proposition II (Book I) of Newton's \(Principia\) (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    20 May 2009
    0 references
    This is an in-depth study of Proposition II of Book I of the 1726 edition of Newton's \textit{Principia}, asking and answering a series of important questions regarding its first appearance, its content, its proof, and its overall significance for the \textit{Principia}. Proposition II of Book I is not cited at all in Book I, but plays an important role in Book III, leading to the conjecture that its appearance in Newton's work coincides with that of the material in Book III. To understand its statement, the author first presents the meaning of the notions of \textit{evanescent quantities}, \textit{motive force}, and \textit{change in motion}. An analysis of its proof finds a number of irreparable flaws, notably a non-trivial limit process that cannot be repaired in the sense of providing a proof at ``a level of rigor consistent with the more convincing arguments in the \textit{Principia}'' that Newton himself could conceivably have given.
    0 references
    Newton's \textit{Principia}
    0 references

    Identifiers