On a problem of Erdős on integers, none of which divides the product of \(k\) others (Q1041201): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the density of primitive sets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5608848 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Families of finite sets in which no set is covered by the union of \(r\) others / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On product representation of powers. I / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5614074 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: \(C_ 6\)-free bipartite graphs and product representation of squares / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An extremal problem for paths in bipartite graphs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Existence and Construction of Balanced Incomplete Block Designs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q2785586 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 06:25, 2 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On a problem of Erdős on integers, none of which divides the product of \(k\) others
scientific article

    Statements

    On a problem of Erdős on integers, none of which divides the product of \(k\) others (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1 December 2009
    0 references
    Let \(F_{k}(N)\) denote the maximal number of integers selected from \(\{1, \dots, N\}\), so that none of them divides the product of \(k\) others. Following Erdős's approach for \(k = 2\), the authors give a lower estimation to \(F_{k}(N)\) for \(2 \leq k \leq \frac{\log N}{6\log \log N}\). They give an upper bound for \(F_{3}(N)\) and also prove that the lower bound for \(F_{3}(N)\) is sharp apart from a constant factor. The proofs use combinatorial arguments and some elementary number theory.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    multiplicative Sidon set
    0 references
    primitive set
    0 references
    0 references