A long \(\mathbb C^2\) which is not Stein (Q2380819): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the group of holomorphic automorphisms of \(\mathbb{C}{}^ n\) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An increasing sequence of Stein manifolds whose limit is not Stein / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An example concerning polynomial convexity / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: FATOU–BIEBERBACH DOMAINS / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Fatou-Bieberbach domain in \(\mathbb C^2\) which is not Runge / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 15:58, 2 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A long \(\mathbb C^2\) which is not Stein
scientific article

    Statements

    A long \(\mathbb C^2\) which is not Stein (English)
    0 references
    12 April 2010
    0 references
    A complex manifold is a long \(\mathbb C^2\) if it is the increasing union of proper subsets which are biholomorphic to \(\mathbb C^2\). The author proves the following facts: Theorem 1.1. A long \(\mathbb C^2\) need not be biholomorphic to \(\mathbb C^2\). In particular there exists a complex manifold \(X\) such that (1) \(X = \bigcup_{i=0}^\infty X_i\), \(X_i \subset X_{i+1}\), \(X_i \approx \mathbb C^2\); (2) \(X\) is not Stein. Theorem 1.2. If \(X = \bigcup_{i=0}^\infty X_i\) is a long \(\mathbb C^2\) and each \((X_i, X_{i+1})\) is a Runge pair, then \(X\) is biholomorphic to \(\mathbb C^2\). This result is a boundary version of the Rothstein lemma about meromorphic continuation and its proof bases on the boundary properties of plurisubharmonic functions and the Hadamard formula for radius of meromorphy.
    0 references
    Stein manifold
    0 references
    biholomorphism
    0 references

    Identifiers