On the projections of convex lattice sets (Q601931): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5769211 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5768387 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q2769047 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Sums, projections, and sections of lattice sets, and the discrete covariogram / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4524010 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 09:17, 3 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | On the projections of convex lattice sets |
scientific article |
Statements
On the projections of convex lattice sets (English)
0 references
29 October 2010
0 references
Can an \(o\)-symmetric convex lattice set of the integer lattice \(Z^n\) be uniquely determined by its lattice projection counts? It is a significative and intensively studied area. In 2005 Gardner, Gronchi, Zong discovered a counterexample with cardinality 11 in the plane. In this article the author proves that it is the only counterexample up to unimodular transformation with cardinality not larger than 17. This is a very special result, and the proof is a long and technical case analysis. If the author or anyone can make the case analysis simpler, or add the further results, I think it will be more suitable.
0 references
discrete tomography
0 references
convex lattice sets
0 references
projection counts
0 references