\(L\)-spaces and the \(P\)-ideal dichotomy (Q624199): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: QN-spaces, wQN-spaces and covering properties / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: There may be simple \(P_{\aleph _ 1}\)- and \(P_{\aleph _ 2}\)-points and the Rudin-Keisler ordering may be downward directed / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Normality in Subsets of Product Spaces / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Gently killing \(S\)-spaces / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Some properties of C(X). I / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4375363 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Directed Sets and Cofinal Types / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4523069 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 18:27, 3 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | \(L\)-spaces and the \(P\)-ideal dichotomy |
scientific article |
Statements
\(L\)-spaces and the \(P\)-ideal dichotomy (English)
0 references
8 February 2011
0 references
\textit{S. Todorčević} [Partition problems in topology. Contemporary Mathematics, 84. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (AMS) (1989; Zbl 0659.54001)] proved that his principle (\(\mathcal K\)) implies that there are no strong \(L\)-spaces of countable tightness; more precisely, \((*)\): a regular space with all finite powers Lindelöf contains no \(L\)-subspaces. The authors derive \((*)\) from the conjunction of \(\mathfrak{p}>\aleph_1\) and a weak version of the \(P\)-ideal dichotomy [cf. \textit{V. A. Lyubetskij}, Dokl. Math. 56, No.~3, 851--854 (1997; Zbl 0958.03040)]; rather than a decomposition into countably many sets orthogonal to the ideal, it asserts the existence of an uncountable such set. To show that this is not covered by Todorčević's result, they construct a model in which \(\mathfrak{p}>\aleph_1\) and in which the \(P\)-ideal dichotomy holds for \(\aleph_1\)-generated ideals but in which all Aronszajn trees are special.
0 references
\(L\)-spaces
0 references
\(P\)-ideal dichotomy
0 references
special Aronszajn tree
0 references
point-finiteness
0 references