Chow motives versus noncommutative motives (Q380276): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5695378 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An introduction to motivic zeta functions of motives / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Nilpotence, radicals and monoidal structures. With an appendix by Peter O'Sullivan. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Spectra, spectra, spectra -- tensor triangular spectra versus Zariski spectra of endomorphism rings / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Idempotent completion of triangulated categories / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3335882 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 00:55, 7 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Chow motives versus noncommutative motives
scientific article

    Statements

    Chow motives versus noncommutative motives (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    13 November 2013
    0 references
    Let \(\text{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}(k)= \text{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}\) be the \(\mathbb{Q}\)-linear, additive and symmetric monoidal category of Chow motives over a field \(k\) and let \(M: \text{SmProj}^{\text{op}}/k\to\text{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}\) be the contravariant functor, that associates to every smooth projective variety \(X\) its Chow motive \(M(X)\). Let \(\mathbb{Q}(1)\in\text{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}\) be the Tate motive. The functor \(F= (-)\otimes\mathbb{Q}(1)\) is an automorphism of the category \(\text{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}\). The orbit category \({\mathcal C}= \text{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}/F\) has the same objects of \(\text{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}\) and morphisms \[ \Hom_{{\mathcal C}}(M(X), M(Y))= \bigoplus_{j\in\mathbb{Z}} \Hom_{\text{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}}(M(X), M(Y)\otimes\mathbb{Q}(j)). \] Let Mot be the triangulated category of non-commutative motives over \(k\). Kontsevich's category KMM identifies with a thick triangulated category of Mot. The category \(KMM_{\mathbb{Q}}\) has a canonical \(\otimes\)-structure. By taking idempotent completion one gets a natural inclusion \(KMM^{\text{id}}_{\mathbb{Q}}\subset \text{Mot}^{\text{id}}_{\mathbb{Q}}\). In this paper the author following ideas of {Konsevitch} in [Mixed non-commutative motives. University of Miami (2010)], shows that there is a fully faithful, \(\mathbb{Q}\)-linear, additive and symmetric monoidal functor \(R: \text{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}\to KMM^{\text{id}}_{\mathbb{Q}}\) and proves a relationship between the finiteness conditons in \(\text{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}\) and in the non-commutative category. More precisely, if \(M(X)\) is Schur finite, resp. Kimura finite, in \(\text{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}\), then \(NC(X)\) has the same property in \(KMM^{\text{id}}_{\mathbb{Q}}\), where \(N\) is the functor \(\text{SmProj}^{\text{op}}\to KMM^{\text{id}}_{\mathbb{Q}}\). The converse holds for Schur finiteness. The author also proves that certain motivic zeta functions admit an intrinsic construction inside the category of non-commutative motives.
    0 references
    Chow motives
    0 references
    noncommutative motives
    0 references
    Kimura and Schur finiteness
    0 references
    motivic measures
    0 references
    motivic zeta functions
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references