The direct image of the relative dualizing sheaf needs not be semiample (Q2445191): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Latest revision as of 09:01, 8 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | The direct image of the relative dualizing sheaf needs not be semiample |
scientific article |
Statements
The direct image of the relative dualizing sheaf needs not be semiample (English)
0 references
14 April 2014
0 references
The authors provide details for the proof of Fujita's second theorem [\textit{T. Fujita}, Proc. Japan Acad., Ser. A 54, 183--184 (1978; Zbl 0412.32029)] claiming that if a fibration \(f: X\to B\) of a compact Kähler manifold \(X\) over a projective curve \(B\) is given, then the direct image sheaf \(V:=f_*\omega_{X/B}\) splits as a direct sum \(V=A\oplus Q\), where \(A\) is an ample vector bundle and \(Q\) is a unitary flat bundle. The main result is Theorem 1.2, claiming that \(V\) needs not be semiample; this theorem answers the question posed by Fujita in 1982.
0 references
Kähler manifold
0 references
projective curve
0 references
dualizing sheaf
0 references
0 references