Fetal ECG extraction from abdominal signals: a review on suppression of fundamental power line interference component and its harmonics (Q2262426): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Design of IIR multiple notch filters / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A confidence limit for the empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert spectral analysis / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 20:45, 9 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Fetal ECG extraction from abdominal signals: a review on suppression of fundamental power line interference component and its harmonics |
scientific article |
Statements
Fetal ECG extraction from abdominal signals: a review on suppression of fundamental power line interference component and its harmonics (English)
0 references
16 March 2015
0 references
Summary: Interference of power line (PLI) (fundamental frequency and its harmonics) is usually present in biopotential measurements. Despite all countermeasures, the PLI still corrupts physiological signals, for example, electromyograms (EMG), electroencephalograms (EEG), and electrocardiograms (ECG). When analyzing the fetal ECG (fECG) recorded on the maternal abdomen, the PLI represents a particular strong noise component, being sometimes 10 times greater than the fECG signal, and thus impairing the extraction of any useful information regarding the fetal health state. Many signal processing methods for cancelling the PLI from biopotentials are available in the literature. In this review study, six different principles are analyzed and discussed, and their performance is evaluated on simulated data (three different scenarios), based on five quantitative performance indices.
0 references