Bounds for fixed points on hyperbolic manifolds (Q2017861): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Finite groups and hyperbolic manifolds / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Lectures on Nielsen fixed point theory / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bounds for fixed points on surfaces / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4872048 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bounds for fixed points and fixed subgroups on surfaces and graphs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Estimating Nielsen numbers on infrasolvmanifolds / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Quasi-conformal mappings in n-space and the rigidity of hyperbolic space forms / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Topology II. Homotopy and homology. Classical manifolds. Transl. from the Russian / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Strong rigidity of Q-rank 1 lattices / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bounds for fixed points on Seifert manifolds / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bounds for fixed points on hyperbolic 3-manifolds / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 21:51, 9 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Bounds for fixed points on hyperbolic manifolds
scientific article

    Statements

    Bounds for fixed points on hyperbolic manifolds (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    23 March 2015
    0 references
    In Nielsen fixed point theory, the fixed point set of a self-map is considered as a disjoint union of fixed point classes: two fixed points are in the same class if and only if they can be joined by a path (called Nielsen path) which is a path homotopic (relative to endpoints) to its own image. Each fixed point class \(F\) of a self-map \(f\) has an integer-valued index \(ind(f, F)\). The sum of the indices of all fixed point classes is just the Lefschetz number \(L(f)\) and the Nielsen number \(N(f)\) is the number of fixed point classes with non-zero indices. \textit{B. Jiang} [Math. Ann. 311, No. 3, 467--479 (1998; Zbl 0903.55003)] showed that for a surface \(S\) with negative Euler characteristic, there is a constant \(B\) such that \(|ind(f, F)|\leq B\) for any fixed point class \(F\) of any self-map \(f\). Now, people use the notation ``bounded index property (BIP)''. Moreover, one can consider the ``bounded index property for homeomorphisms (BIPH)'', indicating that there is a bound for the indices of all homeomorphisms. The author of the paper under review proves that any compact hyperbolic manifold \(M\) has the BIPH. Moreover, if the dimension of \(M\) is at least \(4\), there is a precise inequality for the index bound: \(\max\{N(f), |L(f)|\}\leq \sum_{F}|ind(f,F)|\leq \max\{\dim H_*(M; \mathbb Z_p)\mid p \text{ is prime} \}\) for any homeomorphism \(f:M\to M\). For \(\dim(M)=3\), the author also gives a concrete bound in some restricted cases. Of course, compact hyperbolic manifolds of dimension \(2\) are the cases considered by B. Jiang.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Nielsen fixed point classes
    0 references
    Nielsen number
    0 references
    index
    0 references
    bounds
    0 references
    hyperbolic manifolds
    0 references
    0 references