Pareto optimization or cascaded weighted sum: a comparison of concepts (Q1736609): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Multiobjective optimization. Interactive and evolutionary approaches / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Nonlinear multiobjective optimization / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On a Bicriterion Formulation of the Problems of Integrated System Identification and System Optimization / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: SMS-EMOA: multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Unbiased approximation in multicriteria optimization / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 21:49, 18 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Pareto optimization or cascaded weighted sum: a comparison of concepts |
scientific article |
Statements
Pareto optimization or cascaded weighted sum: a comparison of concepts (English)
0 references
26 March 2019
0 references
Summary: Looking at articles or conference papers published since the turn of the century, Pareto optimization is the dominating assessment method for multi-objective nonlinear optimization problems. However, is it always the method of choice for real-world applications, where either more than four objectives have to be considered, or the same type of task is repeated again and again with only minor modifications, in an automated optimization or planning process? This paper presents a classification of application scenarios and compares the Pareto approach with an extended version of the weighted sum, called \textit{cascaded weighted sum}, for the different scenarios. Its range of application within the field of multi-objective optimization is discussed as well as its strengths and weaknesses.
0 references
multi-criteria optimization
0 references
Pareto optimization
0 references
weighted sum
0 references
cascaded weighted sum
0 references
global optimization
0 references
population based optimization
0 references
evolutionary algorithm
0 references
0 references