A scientific decision framework for cloud vendor prioritization under probabilistic linguistic term set context with unknown/partial weight information (Q2338040): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. I / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A sequential section process in group decision making with a linguistic assessment approach / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3395303 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 00:33, 21 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | A scientific decision framework for cloud vendor prioritization under probabilistic linguistic term set context with unknown/partial weight information |
scientific article |
Statements
A scientific decision framework for cloud vendor prioritization under probabilistic linguistic term set context with unknown/partial weight information (English)
0 references
20 November 2019
0 references
Summary: With the tremendous growth of Cloud Vendors, Cloud vendor (CV) prioritization is a complex decision-making problem. Previous studies on CV selection use functional and non-functional attributes, but do not have an apt structure for managing uncertainty in preferences. Motivated by this challenge, in this paper, a scientific framework for prioritization of CVs is proposed, which will help organizations to make decisions on service usage. Probabilistic linguistic term set (PLTS) is adopted as a structure for preference information, which manages uncertainty better by allowing partial information ignorance. Decision makers' (DMs) relative importance is calculated using the programming model, by properly gaining the advantage of the partial knowledge and attributes, the weights are calculated using the extended statistical variance (SV) method. Further, DMs preferences are aggregated using a hybrid operator, and CVs are prioritized, using extended COPRAS method under the PLTS context. Finally, a case study on CV prioritization is provided for validating the scientific framework and the results are compared with other methods for understanding the strength and weakness of the proposal.
0 references
cloud vendors
0 references
COPRAS method
0 references
Muirhead mean
0 references
programming model
0 references
statistical variance
0 references
0 references