Correlation coefficients for a study with repeated measures (Q2176050): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q92001379, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1712186161777
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: More efficient unconditional tests for exchangeable binary data with equal cluster sizes / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4895028 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Estimating Correlation Coefficient between Two Variables with Repeated Observations using Mixed Effects Model / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Exact confidence limits for the probability of response in two-stage designs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Optimal inference for Simon's two-stage design with over or under enrollment at the second stage / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Adaptive two-stage optimal designs for phase II clinical studies that allow early futility stopping / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 13:25, 22 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Correlation coefficients for a study with repeated measures
scientific article

    Statements

    Correlation coefficients for a study with repeated measures (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    30 April 2020
    0 references
    Summary: Repeated measures are increasingly collected in a study to investigate the trajectory of measures over time. One of the first research questions is to determine the correlation between two measures. The following five methods for correlation calculation are compared: (1) Pearson correlation; (2) correlation of subject means; (3) partial correlation for subject effect; (4) partial correlation for visit effect; and (5) a mixed model approach. Pearson correlation coefficient is traditionally used in a cross-sectional study. Pearson correlation is close to the correlations computed from mixed-effects models that consider the correlation structure, but Pearson correlation may not be theoretically appropriate in a repeated-measure study as it ignores the correlation of the outcomes from multiple visits within the same subject. We compare these methods with regard to the average of correlation and the mean squared error. In general, correlation under the mixed-effects model with the compound symmetric structure is recommended as its correlation is close to the nominal level with small mean square error.
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references