Correcting for differential recruitment in respondent-driven sampling data using ego-network information (Q2192315): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Inference for respondent-driven sampling with misclassification / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An Economic Model of Friendship: Homophily, Minorities, and Segregation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Markov Graphs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the Theory of Sampling from Finite Populations / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Goodness of Fit of Social Network Models / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Central limit theorems for network driven sampling / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A critical threshold for design effects in network sampling / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5403484 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The effect of differential recruitment, non-response and non-recruitment on estimators for respondent-driven sampling / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 07:12, 23 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Correcting for differential recruitment in respondent-driven sampling data using ego-network information
scientific article

    Statements

    Correcting for differential recruitment in respondent-driven sampling data using ego-network information (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    17 August 2020
    0 references
    Respondent-Driven Sampling (RDS) is a sampling technique employed to collect data from hard-to-reach human populations. Individuals initially selected are asked to recruit from their contacts in the target population till a pre-assigned sample size is reached. It is normally assumed that recruitment by participants is at random. In practice, this is an unrealistic assumption and the aim of the paper is to introduce three types of non random recruitment and present a framework to estimate sampling probabilities under Differential Recruitment (DR) and provide bias correction for prevalence estimators. Variance estimators are also derived by boot strap methods. DR could be through recruitment based on the recruiter's characteristic (called `nodal attributes') which are categorized as `within group DR' and `between group DR' and a third type based on nature of relationship of recruiter( called `tie attributes'). A simulation study is presented and the proposed methods are applied to data collected by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC) which uses RDS for behavior prevalence surveillance among people who inject drugs (PWID). An appendix at the end gives the stationary distributions with DR, consistency of prevalence estimators, transition probabilities and other mathematical details.
    0 references
    0 references
    hard-to-reach population sampling
    0 references
    non-sampling errors
    0 references
    network sampling
    0 references
    social networks
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers