Would you prefer your retirement income to depend on your life expectancy? (Q1995284): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Risk Preferences and the Macroeconomic Announcement Premium / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Labor market estimates of the senior discount for the value of statistical life / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: MULTIATTRIBUTE UTILITY THEORY, INTERTEMPORAL UTILITY, AND CORRELATION AVERSION / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Majorization and the Lorenz order: a brief introduction / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Inequalities: theory of majorization and its applications / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On Monotone Recursive Preferences / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Wealth Inequality and Intergenerational Links / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Longevity-Indexed Life Annuities / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Substitution, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns: A Theoretical Framework / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3329157 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Discounted linear exponential quadratic Gaussian control / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Temporal Resolution of Uncertainty and Dynamic Choice Theory / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On concavity and supermodularity / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Optimal retirement income tontines / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5510285 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Supermodularity and risk aversion / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Supermodularity and the comparative statics of risk / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4486842 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 15:36, 24 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Would you prefer your retirement income to depend on your life expectancy?
scientific article

    Statements

    Would you prefer your retirement income to depend on your life expectancy? (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    23 February 2021
    0 references
    A pension scheme is constructed where the consumption (pension) depends on additional information on the survival probability. There are two periods. The agent learns about her state at the beginning of period one. For each of the states there is a survival probability \(\pi_i\). At the end of period one, the agent learns whether she survives or not. Depending on the state, there is a (maximal) consumption rate \(y_1^i\). In period two, the maximal consumption rate is \(y_2^{i j}\) with \(y_2^{i 0} = 0\) (the agent is dead) and \(y_2^{i 1} > 0\). There is a budget constraint that limits the expected outgo for pensions. The value of the chosen consumption is measured by a utility function \(U(\{(c_1^i,c_2^{i j})\})\). It is assumed that there are \(N\) states \(i \in \{1,2,\ldots, N\}\) chosen at the beginning of period one with equal probabilities. The problem becomes \[ \max_{(y_1^i, y_2^i)} \max_{(c_1^i,c_2^{i j})} U\left(\left\{(c_1^i,c_2^{i j})\right\}_{i ,j} \right)\;, \] subject to \[ c_1^i \le y_1^i\;,\qquad c_2^{i1} \le y_2^i + (1+r)(y_1^i - c_1^i)\; \] \[ \frac1N \sum_{i=1}^N \Bigl(y_1^i + \frac{\pi_i y_2^{i 1}}{1+r}\Bigr) \le B\;. \] The function \(U\) should be increasing in each of the variables. Under the natural assumptions on \(U\), one gets \(c_1^i = y_1^i\), such that the optimisation problem becomes \[ \max_{(c_1^i,c_2^i)} U\left(\left\{(c_1^i,c_2^i)\right\}_{i ,j} \right)\;, \] subject to \[ \frac1N \sum_{i=1}^N \Bigl(c_1^i + \frac{\pi_i c_2^{i 1}}{1+r}\Bigr) = B\;. \] Note that it is possible that the agent may prefer death after period one to a low consumption \(c_1^{i 1}\). The preferences are now defined as \(V_2^i = u_2\) (in the final period) and \(V_1 = u_1 + \beta \mathcal{I}(\{V_2^i\})\) in the first period. The certainty equivalent \(\mathcal{I}\) is assumed to be continuous, increasing, symmetric, translation equivalent and super-modular. \(\beta\) is a time preference parameter and \(u_k\) are utility functions. Examples for the function \(\mathcal{I}\) are \(\mathcal{I}(\{V_2^i\}) = N^{-1} \sum V_2^i\) or \(\mathcal{I}(\{V_2^i\}) = -k^{-1} \ln (N^{-1} \sum e^{-k V_2^i})\) for some \(k \ne 0\). Some basic properties are proved and an explicit example is discussed.
    0 references
    pensions
    0 references
    risk aversion
    0 references
    recursive preferences
    0 references

    Identifiers