Constructing Cantorian counterexamples (Q1362586): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q124983563, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1712286835472 |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004209106100 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2055234364 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 09:38, 30 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Constructing Cantorian counterexamples |
scientific article |
Statements
Constructing Cantorian counterexamples (English)
0 references
5 August 1997
0 references
Cantor's well-known theorem on the power set follows from each of the two propositions: (i) There is no surjective mapping of a set \(A\) onto its power set \({\mathfrak P} (A)\). (ii) There is no injective mapping of \({\mathfrak P} (A)\) into \(A\). The author constructs a proof of (ii) which is in some sense more constructive than the usual proofs. As a strengthening of the non-injectivity he further proves: If \({\mathfrak P} (A) \to A\) is a mapping, then there exist subsets \(B,C\) of \(A\) with \(f(B)= f(C)\), and where \(B\) is a proper subset of \(C\).
0 references
Cantor's theorem
0 references
diagonal argument
0 references
power set
0 references
constructive
0 references