Constructing Cantorian counterexamples (Q1362586): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q124983563, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1712286835472
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004209106100 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2055234364 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 09:38, 30 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Constructing Cantorian counterexamples
scientific article

    Statements

    Constructing Cantorian counterexamples (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    5 August 1997
    0 references
    Cantor's well-known theorem on the power set follows from each of the two propositions: (i) There is no surjective mapping of a set \(A\) onto its power set \({\mathfrak P} (A)\). (ii) There is no injective mapping of \({\mathfrak P} (A)\) into \(A\). The author constructs a proof of (ii) which is in some sense more constructive than the usual proofs. As a strengthening of the non-injectivity he further proves: If \({\mathfrak P} (A) \to A\) is a mapping, then there exist subsets \(B,C\) of \(A\) with \(f(B)= f(C)\), and where \(B\) is a proper subset of \(C\).
    0 references
    Cantor's theorem
    0 references
    diagonal argument
    0 references
    power set
    0 references
    constructive
    0 references

    Identifiers