Subnormal solutions of second order linear differential equations with periodic coefficients (Q1329592): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03323411 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1988314575 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 08:47, 30 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Subnormal solutions of second order linear differential equations with periodic coefficients |
scientific article |
Statements
Subnormal solutions of second order linear differential equations with periodic coefficients (English)
0 references
12 July 1994
0 references
A very complete analysis is conducted for the second order linear differential equation \[ f''+ P(e^ z)f'+ Q(e^ z)f= R_ 1(e^ z)+ R_ 2(e^{-z}),\leqno{(*)} \] where \(P(z)\), \(Q(z)\), \(R_ 1(z)\), and \(R_ 2(z)\) are polynomials in \(z\), such that \(P(z)\) and \(Q(z)\) are not both constant. We say \(f\) is a subnormal solution of equation \((*)\) iff \(f\) satisfies \((*)\) and moreover satisfies the \(R\). Nevanlinna's condition, \[ \varlimsup_{r\to\infty} {\log T(r,f)\over r}= 0. \] It is well-known that the subnormal solution to the homogeneous problem, namely, \(R_ 1(e^ z)= 0\) and \(R_ 2(e^{-z})= 0\) is given by the function \(f(z)= e^{cz}(a_ 0+ a_ 1 e^ z+\cdots+ a_ m e^{mz})\), where \(m\geq 0\) is an integer and \(c,a_ 0,a_ 1,\dots,a_ m\) are constants with \(a_ 0\neq 0\) and \(a_ m\neq 0\). Four remarkable theorems are then stated with very excellent detailed proofs included in latter sections. They relate the degree of the polynomials, \(P\), \(Q\), \(R_ 1\) and \(R_ 2\) and this effect is then transposed to the solutions of the problem. For example if \(\deg P=\deg Q\geq 1\) then the subnormal solution \(f\) to equation \((*)\) must have one of the following two forms: \(f(z)= S_ 1(e^ z)+ S_ 2(e^{-z})+ e^{bz} S_ 3(e^ z)\), where \(S_ 1(z)\), \(S_ 2(z)\), and \(S_ 3(z)\) are polynomials in \(z\), and \(b\) is constant; or \[ f(z)= e^{nz}\left\{cz \sum^ m_{k=0} a_ k e^{- kz}+ S_ 1(e^ z)+ S_ 2(e^{-z})\right\}, \] where \(m\geq 0\) and \(n\) are integers, \(c,a_ 0,a_ 1,\dots,a_ m\) are constants with \(c\neq 0\), \(a_ 0\neq 0\) and \(a_ m\neq 0\). Again \(S_ 1(z)\) and \(S_ 2(z)\) are polynomials in \(z\). All proofs of the theorems are given in significant detail and several examples illustrating the results are also included.
0 references
meromorphic functions
0 references
Nevanlinna characteristic function
0 references
Landau notation
0 references
second order linear differential equation
0 references
subnormal solution
0 references
0 references
0 references