Distinguished trees, double-trees and lifting theorems (Q1417111): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1631-073x(03)00150-x / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2011848650 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 10:02, 30 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Distinguished trees, double-trees and lifting theorems
scientific article

    Statements

    Distinguished trees, double-trees and lifting theorems (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    18 December 2003
    0 references
    A mapping \(f:X\rightarrow Y\) is compact covering if for every compact set \(B\subset Y\) there is a compact set \(A\subset X\) such that \(f(A)=B\). \(f\) is inductively perfect if there is a set \(X' \subset X\) such that \(f(X')=f(X)\) and the restriction \(f\restriction X'\) is perfect. Every inductively perfect mapping is compact covering. It is known that inductively perfect mappings preserve Borel classes \(\Sigma^ 0_ \xi\) and \(\Pi^ 0_ \xi\), \(\xi \geq 2\). In 1984, A.V. Ostrovsky conjectured that a compact covering image of a Borel space is also a Borel space. The main result of this paper answers (in \textbf{ZFC}) this conjecture. The proof involves distinguished trees, introduced in this paper, and a game considered by the same authors in [Topology Appl. 68, 153--185 (1996; Zbl 0848.54024)]. Some other applications of distinguished trees and double-trees are also given.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Borel set
    0 references
    compact covering mapping
    0 references
    inductively perfect mapping
    0 references
    distinguished tree
    0 references
    double tree
    0 references
    0 references