Realizability and intuitionistic logic (Q792319): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00485463 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W4232423688 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 09:44, 30 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Realizability and intuitionistic logic |
scientific article |
Statements
Realizability and intuitionistic logic (English)
0 references
1984
0 references
The paper is largely expository and attempts to clarity the relationship between the well-known proof-interpretation of intuitionistic logical operators on the one hand and realizability interpretations on the other hand, in particular in connection with the theory of types as formulated by \textit{P. Martin-Löf} [see his paper in Logic, methodology and philosophy of science VI, Proc. 6th int. Congr., Hannover 1979, Stud. Logic Found. Math. 104, 153-175 (1982)]. Two typed systems are considered: \(\underset \tilde{} M\underset \tilde{} L_ 0\), the fragment of Martin- Löf's theory without universes, and a weaker system \(\underset \tilde{} M\underset \tilde{} L^ i_ 0\) obtained by dropping extensionality for equality; these systems are compared with \(\underset \tilde{} A\underset \tilde{} P\underset \tilde{} P\), the arithmetical part of \textit{S. Feferman's} theory \(\underset \tilde{} E\underset \tilde{} M_ 0\upharpoonright\) [see his paper in Logic colloquium '78, Proc., Mons/Belgium 1978, Stud. Logic Found. Math. Vol. 97, 159-224 (1979; Zbl 0441.03022)]. It is shown that \(\underset \tilde{} M\underset \tilde{} L^ i_ 0\) can be interpreted straightforwardly in \(\underset \tilde{} A\underset \tilde{} P\underset \tilde{} P\), in such a way that the interpretation of logic in \(\underset \tilde{} M\underset \tilde{} L^ i_ 0\) corresponds to abstract realizability. For \(\underset \tilde{} M\underset \tilde{} L_ 0\) an embedding is defined such that logic in \(\underset \tilde{} M\underset \tilde{} L_ 0\) corresponds to a form of extensional realizability in \(\underset \tilde{} A\underset \tilde{} P\underset \tilde{} P\). \(\underset \tilde{} M\underset \tilde{} L^ i_ 0\) is similar to the fragment without universes of the type theory described in an earlier paper by \textit{P. Martin-Löf} [Logic Colloq. '73, Proc., Bristol 1973, 73-118 (1975; Zbl 0334.02016)]. It should be pointed out that the present paper gives no adequate description of the semantics associated with Martin-Löf's theories.
0 references
proof-interpretation
0 references
formulae-as-types
0 references
proof-interpretation of intuitionistic logical operators
0 references
realizability interpretations
0 references
typed systems
0 references
abstract realizability
0 references
extensional realizability
0 references
type theory
0 references
0 references