On the maximal length of two sequences of consecutive integers with the same prime divisors (Q1264179): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01952052 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1997497917 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 10:51, 30 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the maximal length of two sequences of consecutive integers with the same prime divisors
scientific article

    Statements

    On the maximal length of two sequences of consecutive integers with the same prime divisors (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1989
    0 references
    For each integer \(n\geq 2\) let Supp(n) denote the set of prime factors of n. Suppose that for \(1\leq i\leq k\) we have \[ (1)\quad Supp(x+i)=Supp(y+i) \] where x,y,k are positive integers. A problem of P. Erdős and A. Woods is the following: Does there exist an integer \(k\geq 2\) such that (1) implies \(x=y?\) The authors prove that (1) implies that \[ (2)\quad \log k\leq C, (\log x\quad \log \log x)^{1/2}\quad for\quad x\geq 3 \] \[ (3)\quad y-x>\exp (C_ 2 k (\log k)^ 2 (\log \log k)^{-1})\quad for\quad k\geq 3 \] and \[ (4)\quad y-x>(k\quad \log \log y)^ D\quad for\quad y\geq 27 \] where \(D=C_ 3 k (\log \log y)\) (log log log y)\({}^{-1}\). Here \(C_ 1,C_ 2,C_ 3\) are effectively computable absolute positive constants. A powerful ingredient of the proof is an inequality of A. Baker dealing with the linear forms in the logarithms of rational numbers.
    0 references
    Baker's results
    0 references
    consecutive integers
    0 references
    linear forms in logarithms
    0 references
    prime factors
    0 references

    Identifiers