A proof system for contact relation algebras (Q1576385): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004764610651 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2060589018 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 11:10, 30 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | A proof system for contact relation algebras |
scientific article |
Statements
A proof system for contact relation algebras (English)
0 references
7 March 2001
0 references
A contact relation on a set \(W\) is a reflexive and symmetric relation satisfying a kind of extensionality axiom: if \(xCz \Leftrightarrow yCz\) for all \(z \in W\), then \(x=y\). An intuitive example of a contact structure is provided by a collection of regions in some space, where the contact relation \(C\) is defined by \(xCY \Leftrightarrow x \cap y \neq 0\). However, there is a wide variety of other natural models of contact structures. Relation algebras appeared in spatial reasoning due to \textit{M. Egenhofer} and \textit{J. Sharma} [``Topological consistency'', in: Fifth Internat. Symp. on Spatial Data Handling, Charleston, SC (1992)]. In the paper under review, a sound and complete proof system for relation algebras generated by a contact relation (CRAs, for short) is presented. The primitive notions of the system are contact and identity relations, as well as the relational operators \(\cup, \cap,-,;,\breve{\;}\). Formulas are of the form \(x R y\), where \(R\) is a ``contact expression''. Two more results are obtained: the equational theory of CRAs is undecidable, and the class of contact structures cannot be axiomatised by modal formulas.
0 references
contact relation
0 references
mereology
0 references
spatial reasoning
0 references
relation algebras
0 references
equational theory
0 references