Not every metrizable compactum is the limit of an inverse sequence with simplicial bonding maps (Q1709057): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q130064891, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1727085673467 |
||
Property / Wikidata QID | |||
Property / Wikidata QID: Q130064891 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 11:01, 23 September 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Not every metrizable compactum is the limit of an inverse sequence with simplicial bonding maps |
scientific article |
Statements
Not every metrizable compactum is the limit of an inverse sequence with simplicial bonding maps (English)
0 references
27 March 2018
0 references
It is well known that each compact metrizable space can be written as the inverse limit of an inverse sequence of finite polyhedra with piecewise linear bonding maps. This means that for each bonding map of the inverse system, its domain and range can be triangulated so that the bonding map is simplicial. In this short note it is shown that one can't choose fixed triangulations on terms of the inverse system, which would make all bonding maps simplicial. To put it differently, not every metrizable compactum can be written as the inverse limit of an inverse sequence of finite triangulated polyhedra with simplicial bonding maps. The paper was posthumously prepared and edited by Leonard R. Rubin, to whom the argument was communicated by Sibe Mardešić.
0 references
absolute extensor
0 references
cohomological dimension
0 references
CW-complex
0 references
extension theory
0 references
inverse limit
0 references
inverse sequence
0 references
polyhedron
0 references
simplicial map
0 references
triangulation
0 references