Coverings of the smallest Paige loop. (Q644694): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Normalize DOI. |
Normalize DOI. |
||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S10801-011-0284-6 / rank | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S10801-011-0284-6 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 23:33, 9 December 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Coverings of the smallest Paige loop. |
scientific article |
Statements
Coverings of the smallest Paige loop. (English)
0 references
7 November 2011
0 references
If \(G\) is a loop then we say that the smallest number of subloops needed to cover \(G\) is the covering number of \(G\). It was shown by \textit{M. J. Tomkinson} [in Math. Scand. 81, No. 2, 191-198 (1997; Zbl 0905.20014)] that there does not exist a group with a covering number of seven. He also conjectured that there are no groups with a covering number of eleven. Coverings of groups have been broadly explored and some results have been shown by \textit{T. Foguel} and \textit{L.-C. Kappe} [in Expo. Math. 23, No. 3, 255-270 (2005; Zbl 1103.20064)] to also hold for loops. The author proves in this paper that even though there does not exist a group with a covering number of seven, there does exist a finite simple Moufang loops, namely a Paige loop, that has seven as its covering number. Moreover, its automorphism group permutes all such coverings, with seven proper subloops, transitively.
0 references
covering numbers
0 references
unions of subloops
0 references
finite simple Moufang loops
0 references
Paige loops
0 references
generalized hexagons
0 references
split Cayley hexagons
0 references